Since 2000, U.S. and Western sanctions have played a decisive role in toppling governments across the Global South, from Iraq and Libya to Syria, Venezuela, and Afghanistan. This article examines the clear pattern: prolonged sanctions collapse economies, fuel unrest, trigger disputed elections, invite foreign intervention, and ultimately result in regime change. Zimbabwe narrowly escaped the same fate. Through a politically conscious and legally grounded anti-sanctions strategy led by civil society organisations such as ZASM, the struggle was shifted from a bilateral confrontation with the United States to a multilateral challenge involving the UN, SADC, and South Africa. This pressure led to the removal of sanctions, stabilised the economy, and averted invasion or regime change. The piece also explores how similar tactics are now being applied against Russia and China to preserve Western economic dominance.
The US–South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Bill has passed through the House Committee. It allows the US President to investigate and potentially sanction South African officials over alleged threats to US interests, support for Hamas, ties with Iran and Russia, and the ICJ genocide case against Israel. This could trigger economic sanctions under IEEPA and Magnitsky laws, impacting South Africa’s economy, parastatals, and international relations.
Description:
ZASM successfully fought Western sanctions on Zimbabwe using UN reports, legal action, and diplomatic pressure. Their efforts led to the U.S., EU, and UK lifting sanctions, restoring over 100 correspondent banking relationships. Zimbabwe can now process Visa, Mastercard, and international transfers freely. This marks a major financial and diplomatic victory, unlocking trade, investment, and economic recovery for the country after 24 years of isolation.


