Rutendo Matinyarare examines two recent Constitutional Court judgments concerning Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 and the role of the judiciary in reviewing the conduct of the President and Parliament. The article explores the Court’s decision to decline direct jurisdiction in the war veterans’ application and its ruling that challenges to the legislative process are premature before Parliament has completed its deliberations. It raises broader questions about constitutional interpretation, judicial responsibility, separation of powers, and the role of Zimbabwe’s apex court in safeguarding constitutional governance.